LAUNCH OFFERAll-access for $169 $99Claim →
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY · VERSION 1.0

How a money claim becomes a comparable research record.

We use a consistent framework to extract what a creator says, identify what the claim leaves out, and turn the method into a decision a beginner can test with limited downside.

Method owner: Yee, Founder & Research Editor · Reviewed 2026-08-30
THE PIPELINE

From source to published guide

Automation helps with scale; a fixed schema and editorial review provide consistency and accountability.

01

Collect

Identify a relevant public video and retain its title, channel, URL, publication context, and transcript-derived source material.

02

Extract

Use newmax.ai to organize the method into repeatable fields instead of preserving only the headline outcome.

03

Evaluate

Check internal consistency, separate claims from inference, surface missing costs, and verify changing facts when they affect a decision.

04

Publish

Edit for a clear answer, comparison, limitations, and a small validation step. Add dates, author responsibility, and relevant source links.

STANDARD FIELDS

What we try to capture

Availability varies by source. A blank field is not silently converted into a fact.

01Audience and buyer
02Offer and promised outcome
03Traffic source
04Acquisition workflow
05Tools and startup cost
06Production pipeline
07Pricing and unit economics
08Time requirements
09Skills and dependencies
10Creator-stated benchmarks
11Risks and failure points
12Smallest useful test
EVIDENCE LABELS

Three kinds of statement

SOURCE CLAIM

What a creator reports

Revenue, traffic, timelines, conversion, or experience stated by the original creator. Attribution does not mean independent verification or typicality.

CHECKED FACT

What a primary source supports

Current product terms, platform rules, pricing, or public documentation checked against an authoritative source when material to the decision.

EDITORIAL INFERENCE

What our analysis concludes

A judgment derived from the available inputs—for example, that a method has high distribution risk. It should be explained, not disguised as a measured fact.

LIMITATIONS

What this process cannot prove

A video rarely provides audited financials, a representative sample, complete expenses, refunds, opportunity cost, or failure rates. Results may be exceptional, outdated, or dependent on an existing audience. The database helps compare claims; it does not validate guaranteed earnings.

UPDATES & CORRECTIONS

What changes after publication

Material factual or editorial changes receive an updated date. Duplicate methods may be consolidated, broken links replaced, and unsupported statements narrowed or removed. Corrections can be sent to Yee on X.